Busy Lagos street with yellow minibuses, market stalls and a road sign for Marina, Carter Bridge and Ikoyi

About

Share

Busy Lagos street with yellow minibuses, market stalls and a road sign for Marina, Carter Bridge and Ikoyi

The pillars of our work

Rigorous, collaborative research

Purposeful communication and policy engagement

Applied research training and mentoring

ICTD researchers meeting officials around a boardroom table, with the flags of Uganda and the East African Community behind them

Our Impact

Established in 2010, ICTD has helped shape policy debates, inform administrative reforms, and strengthen the use of evidence in tax systems. It has also shown that better reform is possible when rigorous research is grounded in sustained partnerships that keep it connected to the realities of tax policy and administration.
The Institute of Development Studies building, ICTD's home institution

Our Home Institution

ICTD is based at the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), an independent research institute located at the University of Sussex. Founded in 1966, IDS delivers world-class research, learning and teaching that transforms the knowledge, action and leadership needed for more equitable and sustainable development globally. Since 2016, IDS, in partnership with the University of Sussex, has been annually ranked first in the world for Development Studies in the QS World University Rankings by Subject.

Funders

Principles of Engagement with Partners

Collaborative research and engagement are central to ICTD’s work. We work closely with a wide range of partners including governments, tax administrations, civil society organisations, and international agencies to produce research that is rigorous, policy-relevant, and grounded in real-world challenges.

As one of the earliest organisations to undertake sustained research partnerships with revenue authorities in Africa, we have developed a particular approach to working with tax administrations, reflecting both the opportunities and the complexities of conducting and publishing research based on administrative data.

1. Building Strong Partnerships with Tax Administrations

Strong collaboration between researchers and tax administrations can lead to better evidence, stronger policy design, and, ultimately, more equitable and effective tax systems. While researchers and practitioners have historically worked separately — often with different priorities, timelines, and expectations — partnerships between independent researchers and African revenue authorities have become more common. Over time, ICTD’s experience has shown the value of working together from the outset, and throughout research projects’ cycle.

Drawing on these experiences, ICTD and the Uganda Revenue Authority developed a set of shared principles for collaboration. These principles were later adopted by the African Tax Administration Forum (ATAF) and endorsed by UNU-WIDER. These principles remain central to ICTD’s approach to collaboration, which is outlined below.

Successful collaboration begins with clear expectations and open communication. Researchers and tax administrations may have different objectives, working styles, and timelines, so it is important to establish shared understandings from the start.

Partnerships are usually guided by a memorandum of understanding that clarifies:

  • roles and responsibilities 
  • timelines and resource commitments 
  • processes for communication and resolving disagreements 
  • expectations around outputs and dissemination 

Because collaborative research can require significant staff time and operational support from tax administrations, both sides should ensure that projects are realistic, well-coordinated, and aligned with institutional priorities.

Protecting taxpayer data and confidentiality is a fundamental responsibility for all parties involved in research partnerships.

Key principles include:

  • administrative data shared with researchers should be anonymised before access is granted 
  • tax administrations retain ownership of their administrative data, while researchers can use it for agreed projects
  • data should never be shared with third parties outside of agreed projects without the explicit consent of the tax administration
  • arrangements around any additional data collected during research (such as survey data or interviews) should be made separately from those related to administrative data 

Tax administrations are also encouraged to make aggregate revenue and performance data publicly available wherever possible, while clearly explaining methodologies, classifications, and limitations.

ICTD strongly encourages research that is co-designed and co-produced with tax administration staff. Collaborative research is more likely to generate policy-relevant findings, build institutional ownership, and support uptake into practice.

Effective collaboration includes:

  • using accessible, non-technical language throughout the research process 
  • involving tax administration staff in research design, implementation, analysis, and dissemination 
  • allocating dedicated personnel and sufficient institutional support for research engagement 
  • ensuring participating staff have the appropriate skills, experience, and time to contribute meaningfully

Research partnerships should create benefits for both researchers and practitioners. Beyond producing evidence, collaboration should contribute to strengthening research and analytical capacity within tax administrations.

This may include:

  • training in research methods and data analysis 
  • practical experience in conducting and managing research projects 
  • support with communicating findings to policymakers and wider audiences 
  • joint learning throughout all stages of the research process 

Practitioners are active partners in research, not simply providers of data.

Collaborative research depends on contributions from many different actors, including those involved in data preparation, project coordination, implementation, analysis, and writing.

ICTD encourages:

  • appropriate recognition of all substantive contributions through co-authorship or acknowledgements, in line with ICTD’s guidelines on co-authorship
  • fair treatment of implementation and operational work as important research contributions 
  • clear agreements on intellectual property and publication rights from the outset 

In general:

  • tax administrations retain ownership of administrative data and internally produced institutional materials 
  • Researchers, identified as authors of the relevant outputs, retain authorship and intellectual ownership of their analytical outputs 
  • tax administrations should be able to use and disseminate research outputs with appropriate attribution and acknowledgement of authors

Research should be communicated in ways that are accessible and useful to a wide range of audiences, including policymakers, practitioners, and the public.

Researchers working on ICTD projects are normally expected to publish the outputs of their research. More specifically, theyare encouraged to:

  • publish findings in academic and policy-focused formats 
  • produce accessible summaries of key findings and policy implications 
  • disseminate outputs in relevant national or official languages where appropriate 
  • clearly communicate the limitations of findings and recommendations 

Publications based on administrative data should only include de-identified and aggregated statistics, and should acknowledge that the views expressed are those of the authors, not necessarily those of the respective institutions.

In some cases, tax administrations may request a temporary embargo – typically no longer than 6 months – on publication where findings relate to sensitive or upcoming policy reforms.

Both researchers and tax administrations share responsibility for ensuring that partnerships remain effective, transparent, and impactful.

This includes:

  • monitoring compliance with agreed principles and highlighting any concern
  • maintaining efficient communication and coordination 
  • tracking and communicating about how research findings influence policy and practice over time 

Collaborative research works best when partnerships are based on trust, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to producing evidence that strengthens tax systems and supports public policy.

Partner Spotlight

We work with partners to generate evidence, strengthen research capacity and support reform choices grounded in real administrative, political and institutional challenges. Partner Spotlight shares recent news and updates from some of this collaborative work.

The Addis Tax Initiative (ATI) is a multi-stakeholder partnership that brings together partner countries, development partners, and supporting organisations, with an aim to foster collective action to strengthen tax systems in response to recognised gaps in development finance. ICTD and the ATI currently collaborate on several workstreams, including tax and informality, minimum standards for tax expenditure reporting, and wealth taxation.

ATAF serves as an African network that aims at improving tax systems in Africa through exchanges and knowledge dissemination. ATAF Executive Secretary, Mary Baine, is a member of ICTD’s Advisory Group; ICTD also has an MOU with ATAF working closely on several areas including informality, digitalisation and taxing high net worth individuals.

Partners